Value Protection is Not Optional
- Jon Hubbard, Shareholder
- 2 hours ago
- 5 min read
Accounting firm leaders invest considerably in building value. They expand and modernize service lines, deepen client relationships, implement new technology and recruit and develop talent. That’s a lot of hard work that transforms what their firms deliver.
And yet there’s often still a gap between the value the firm creates and the value it captures. In many cases, the culprit is a pricing and billing problem.
Value protection is the discipline of ensuring the value the firm creates translates into the revenue the firm receives. It’s a management imperative. And for most firms, it’s a neglected source of unrealized margin.
Profitability is the true measure of execution
Growth on its own isn’t a sufficient measure of firm health. Revenue growth that doesn’t translate into improved profitability per engagement, per client, and per professional is unsustainable. If revenue per full-time equivalent (FTE) isn’t rising year over year, the firm is scaling effort without scaling return.
Many firm leaders feel more comfortable discussing top-line growth than profitability. But profitability is a better signal. It tells you whether the firm completed the work AND whether you priced, scoped and delivered it in a way that justified the firm’s investment of time and expertise.
The shift to advisory services, subscription-based pricing and value billing makes this even more critical. When billable hours aren’t the primary metric, firms must be deliberate about where and how they assign value and whether their billing practices consistently reflect that value.
The decentralized pricing problem
Many firm leaders acknowledge they have inconsistent pricing and billing practices. Fewer are willing to trace that inconsistency to pricing decisions made at the individual partner level. Partners make these decisions in isolation without standardized criteria or accountability.
This leads to predictable consequences. Two partners do essentially the same work for clients of comparable size and complexity, but bill different amounts. One captures the full value while the other defaults to hours times rate, leaving the premium for expertise, risk and judgment unbilled.
When individual discretion governs pricing, we see a systematic undervaluation of the firm’s capabilities. Partners who are uncertain about the value of their services err on the side of underpricing. Partners who are reluctant to have difficult conversations with long-tenured clients absorb scope creep rather than address it. Partners who are accustomed to hourly billing default to that. Individual judgment, under the pressures of client relationships and the day-to-day workload, almost always prioritizes harmony over margin.
The standardization illusion
Many firms attempt to address pricing inconsistency with what they describe as standardization. In reality, that usually means communicating best practices.
This approach doesn’t work. Communicating best practices doesn’t change behavior. It documents expectations without creating the accountability, oversight or process infrastructure needed to enforce them. Partners who have priced their own work for a decade or more don’t change that behavior because they attend a meeting on value pricing. The muscle memory is too strong, and the client relationships are too entangled.
Real standardization requires structural change, including centralized oversight of billing decisions, defined approval thresholds for pricing on higher-value engagements and a designated role with the data and authority to identify and address pricing gaps.
The case for centralized billing
Centralized billing can be a sensitive topic in accounting firm management. In a traditional partnership structure, partners have built their books of business and managed client relationships autonomously for years. Any suggestion that billing authority should be consolidated at the firm level can feel like an affront.
But that resistance is softening. It’s easy to find examples of other firms that made the transition, are more than willing to share the positives and view a return to decentralized practices as unthinkable.
Forces external to firm culture also play a part. Firms are adopting artificial intelligence in audit, tax and advisory workflows, and it’s compressing the time required to deliver work. A research task that previously required ten hours may now require two. If billing decisions remain at the partner level, the firm’s pricing does not automatically adjust to reflect the value delivered. Centralized oversight allows the firm to make a deliberate, informed decision about whether to pass time savings to the client, maintain pricing at the value level or some combination of both.
As a result, many firm leaders recognize that centralized billing is the right direction. Now, the question is how to get there without triggering the partnership dynamics that can kill the conversation before it starts.
Let service lines lead firm-wide reform
A service-line approach is a useful entry point for firms that recognize the need for centralized billing but aren’t ready to implement a firm-wide change right away. Leaders can identify one or two service lines with favorable conditions for centralization. These include a strong service line leader, a well-defined scope and pricing structure and a portfolio of clients where value billing is already a natural conversation.
Starting with a pilot roll-out accomplishes two things. It builds an internal proof of concept, demonstrating that centralized billing improves realization without damaging client relationships. And it creates the institutional knowledge needed to scale, including processes, communication templates, training and change management.
Billing discipline is a skill, and skills require investment
One common misconception is that experienced professionals inherently know how to bill for their services. They don’t. Being able to accurately assess the value of one’s services, communicate that value confidently to a client and document and bill accordingly is a distinct skill that many accounting professionals have never learned.
As a result, partners and managers may be technically excellent but consistently underprice their work. Billing has an emotional dimension. The discomfort of raising fees with a long-standing client, the reluctance to price a relationship-driven engagement at full value and the impulse to absorb scope creep rather than address it are real, and you can’t resolve it without treating billing competence as a professional discipline.
This means formal training in value-based pricing, clear internal standards for documenting and billing scope changes and defined roles with ownership over billing quality. It also means ensuring the professionals responsible for pricing decisions are the right people for those decisions. They need technical knowledge to assess service value and the disposition to enforce pricing standards consistently.
That’s why many firms have appointed a dedicated billing function. Whether that’s a billing director, a pricing committee, or a designated operations leader, this function supports partner judgment with data, benchmarks and accountability structures that individual judgment cannot reliably sustain on its own.
Make the commitment
Once you build strong client relationships, invest in talent and expand your service capabilities, you’ve done the hard work of value creation. Value protection ensures that work produces its full return.
This is a fundamental responsibility of firm leadership, and it begins with an honest assessment of your current pricing authority, discipline around billing standards and who, if anyone, owns the outcome.
Treat value protection as a non-negotiable dimension of firm management. The infrastructure and proven models exist. Now, you need to commit to implementing them.
Could your firm’s HR and talent leaders benefit from a peer network?
The Boomer Talent Circle is a community of talent leaders from forward-thinking firms who are committed to aligning human resources and firm strategy at the highest levels. Apply now to start shaping your firm for the future.
Jon Hubbard is a nationally recognized consultant, thought leader and Shareholder at Boomer Consulting, where he helps accounting firms achieve sustainable growth, develop strong leaders and build high-performing teams. With deep expertise in business development, leadership and client experience, Jon guides firms in clarifying their messaging, improving team dynamics and achieving long-term success. His practical and forward-thinking advice led to recognition as one of Inside Public Accounting’s Most Recommended Consultants and as a CPA Practice Advisor 20 Under 40 Influencer.
Comments